Nature Vs. Nurture, revisited
From the article, Having An Older Brother Raises A Male’s Chances Of Being Gay:
A male is more likely to be gay if he has an older brother, the likelihood grows the more older brothers he has. The percentage of gay males is estimated to be around 3%, this probability can go up to 5% for males with several older brothers, say researchers from Brock University, St. Catharines, Canada.
The researchers are certain there is a biological basis for sexual orientation - in other words, there is a prenatal effect. It is not a case of older brothers having a psychological effect on the male baby after it is born. Males with older stepbrothers, or adopted brothers, are not more likely to be gay, only males with blood brothers. The scientists say the effect has to be through the mother, the only link between them.
From an evolutionary standpoint I think its fairly clear that there is no possible way homosexuality is GENETIC.
For genes to survive and propagate, they have to be able to reproduce. How long do you think a gene is going to last when its instructions say “hey! have sex with males!”
That gene doesn’t have an icecubes’ chance in hell of surviving past a few generations, let alone millions of years of human evolution. I think anyone hoping out for a GENETIC explanation is gonna be hoping for a long, long time. It doesn’t make sense genetically.
Now, a simply biological explanation is not only feasable but seems to be the only reasonable explanation to me. People come out of the womb deformed in lots and lots of different ways, every day, all the time. And its not just reproductively deformed either… mentally retarded, deformed limbs, blind, deaf, etc etc.
Are these diseases, per se? No. Did the person “learn” to be deaf? No. Fact of the matter is, the human reproductive system, despite is elegance and complexity, is not fool proof nor is it error free. When you have 6+ billion people all over the world fuckin and pumpin out babies, the odds that the reproductive system is going to fail is pretty good.
This leaves us with people being born “defected” if you will — and some of those people have defective systems that idenfity their gender and their sexual orientation. They ARE born gay, but its not a gene that can be passed down and spread.
The day we “cure” homosexuality is the day we “cure” miscarraiges, deaf or blind children, mental retardation, and every single other developmental mishap that is not a genetic predisposed disease.
In other words, never. The point here is that being gay isn’t a person’s fault any more than being born blind or with brown hair or with fair skin. Going on to prejudice gay people for something that isn’t under their control is about as compassionate as leaving blind babies gutters because they can’t see. There’s absolutely nothing that can change the fact that they are gay, so you should do what people do for every other person who isn’t born a “normal, healthy” human: try and allow them to live as fulfilling a life as they can, in whatever way they deem possible. And if that way isn’t causing you any harm, why do you care? So a couple of gay people get married so they can have a will and a next of kin. How does that hurt you, or anyone for that matter? It’s not going to teach little kids to “be gay” because its not something that can be taught.
Just another example, I suppose, of the religious neo-con right going around imposing their values onto systems that they fear because they are too uneducated to understand them. Of course the ultra-left liberals are probably just as bad in the opposite direction doing something equally retarded, but they don’t have any power in this country to do anything so who cares.

